Raising Retrieval Quality: Rerankers and Hybrid Search

AI Navigate Original / 5/16/2026

共有:

Key Points

  • RAG being plausible-but-off is mainly a retrieval-accuracy problem
  • Hybrid search combines vector and keyword; rerankers reorder candidates
  • Also query rewriting, chunk design, metadata filters
  • Measure improvements with eval data; RAG is 90% retrieval

Raising Retrieval Quality: Rerankers and Hybrid Search

The main cause of RAG being "plausible but off-target" is retrieval accuracy. The standard improvements are rerankers and hybrid search.

Hybrid Search

  • Use vector search (semantic nearness) and keyword search (word match) together
  • Proper nouns, model numbers, abbreviations favor keywords; using both reduces misses

Reranker

  1. Retrieve a generous set of candidates in primary search
  2. Re-evaluate relevance to the question with a reranker model and reorder
  3. Pass only the top ones to the generation prompt (noise reduction)

Other Improvements

  • Query rewriting (convert vague questions for search)
  • Revisiting chunk design (many accuracy problems are here)
  • Metadata filters (narrow by permission/period)

Caution

Adopt improvements only after measuring effect with evaluation data (same principle as the prompt-evaluation chapter). Adding blindly only makes it slower and costlier.

Chapter Summary

RAG is "90% retrieval." Raise retrieval quality with hybrid + rerank + good chunk design, and always measure the effect. This is the core of practical RAG.